Deep thought

Bigotry is not a result of ignorance
Bigotry is a result of Fear and it is impervious to data
Replace fear with relationships

Paraphrasing Reza Aslan

Truth and consequences

There's this odd idea that a person is innocent until proven guilty. An idea necessary in our legal system. Necessary when the state is deciding to take someone's life liberty or property because they were accused of violating the law.
Is it necessary in our communities?
Does every violation of life, liberty and property need to be handled in court?
Does every injustice need to go to trial?
If a person does not go to trial, does that mean that person is innocent?
Beyond a reasonable doubt is crucial in a court of law.
But, that does not negate a society from enacting consequences for actions outside of the law.

Actions that don't deprive a person of their life, liberty or property.
Many people who have been violated do not choose to involve the law. That does not mean their violator is innocent. Nor does it mean that the violator should not face any consequences for their actions.

Simple rule for human interaction

Don't touch another person without their consent unless it's in strict self defense (to stop an imminent threat)

Everything should be handled at the lowest level possible 

Government involvement a last resort